I haven’t done a breakdown of a SCOTUS (Supreme Court of the United States) in a while (they were poorly read so I haven’t bothered with the research needed). BUT, I do still sometimes read opinions.
And I just have to say Clarence Thomas is a windbag. He isn’t stupid or anything, but I feel like he writes his “concurrent opinions” just too often. And they are too long.
This comes up because of the Court Opinion on Quarles v. United States. I mean, in this case Thomas manages to keep his opinion to only two pages – but it is literally 2 pages of “I agree with everyone else.” And since it was (unusually enough) an unanimous opinion – it’s not like he was getting to spar with Ginsburg or something.
I just had to say it – it was irksome and I felt the need to vent to the entire internet that Thomas annoys me with his “I have to say it because I’m a special snowflake” approach. He writes separate opinions a LOT. Maybe I’ll go back and see how often each justice write a separate opinion and see if he really does it more or I just notice his more. Might be an interesting exercise.